Search for: "Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA"
Results 141 - 160
of 207
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2013, 12:54 pm
Supreme Court held in Whitman v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:57 pm
The Intervenor, Utility Air Regulatory Group (UARG), on the other hand, urges us to uphold the SIL provisions EPA established, or alternatively, to remand the SIL provisions without ordering that they be vacated." [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
See Lujan v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
See Lujan v. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 10:21 pm
EPA is responding to prior petitions for reconsideration by the Utility Air Regulatory Group. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 11:37 am
(Interestingly, several of the utilities among the Petitioner members had earlier argued the opposite during the Supreme Court argument in AEP v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:52 pm
In a case called Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 1:11 pm
The American Petroleum Institute, the Utility Air Regulatory Group, and the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (collectively the API) petition for review of that rule, claiming EPA, in adopting the NAAQS, was arbitrary and capricious and violated the Clean Air Act. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm
Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:26 pm
EPA, GHGs are an “air pollutant” under the Clean Air Act. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 4:30 am
EPA is plainly following the Clean Air Act and the Supreme Court’s decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia today for review of EPA's final Utility MACT rule, in National Mining Association v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
EPA, case numbers 09-1322, 10-1092 and 10-1073; and American Chemistry Council v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 10:21 am
We are becoming accustomed to some pretty darned outrageous claims by industry groups and their advocates as we draw closer to the mid-December plan by the US EPA to (finally!) [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:02 pm
These politicians are attempting to introduce bills that would limit the EPA’s regulatory powers. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:01 pm
Environmental organizations argue that according to the Clean Air Act -- and reinforced by a 2001 Supreme Court decision in Whitman v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:39 am
The Clean Air Act entrusts such complex balancing to EPA in the first instance, in combination with state regulators. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:54 am
Currently, the EPA's regulations under the Clean Air Act are only under development. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:54 am
Currently, the EPA's regulations under the Clean Air Act are only under development. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:57 am
Inc. v. [read post]
