Search for: "VIDAL V. STATE"
Results 141 - 160
of 255
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am
Lastly, United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
United States, 17-6540, Orr v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am
Vidal, 18-589 – involve the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 9:34 am
” Batalla-Vidal v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 4:17 pm
The Court could not make an award of “vindicatory” damages, merely to mark the commission of the wrong; this was wrong in principle: see R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] 1 AC 245 [97-100]. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 8:52 am
The Safari Workaround was essentially the subject-matter of Vidal-Hall v Google Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 311 [2016] QB 1003. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am
Jonathan Masur – "The outcome in Oil States provides a possibly counter-intuitive answer as to whether panel stacking by the PTO director will remain permissible. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
United States (argued and briefed as Dalmazzi v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 1:35 am
In The Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor v TLU & Anor [2018] EWCA Civ 2217 the Court of Appeal, was asked to review one aspect of Mr Justice Mitting’s decision in TLT & Ors v The Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2016] EWHC 2217 (QB). [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 2:33 am
It was further accepted that, subject to proof, damages were recoverable by those four claimants for distress both at common law and, following Vidal-Hall v Google Inc, under section 13 of the 1998. [read post]
23 May 2018, 9:57 am
For example, similar rights already existed under English law as a result of s13 DPA 1998 (which afforded data subjects a right to bring direct claims against a data controller for losses caused by a breach of DPA 1998)—this right was interpreted broadly by the English courts as including a right to compensation for non-pecuniary losses of the type contemplated by GDPR (see Vidal-Hall v Google). [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:49 am
However, such an approach would have potentially been problematic as, unlike in Vidal-Hall v Google [2015] EWCA 311 (where the Court of Appeal disapplied section 13(2) of the DPA), there was no real discrepancy between the EU parent legislation (Directive 95/46/EC/the Data Protection Directive) and the domestic legislation. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 1:11 pm
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In a 55 page opinion in the consolidated cases of Vidal v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 6:18 pm
La gran víctima de la audiencia del día de hoy ha sido la verdad. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
“That means less consumer goods and supplies for the productive sector, which effects growth,” said Vidal, who expects little if any growth this year despite increased government spending and foreign investment. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am
On November 9, a federal court in New York pared down two lawsuits in New York (Vidal v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 5:59 am
The court reserved until a later date any ruling on the defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (Vidal v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:59 am
This confirms and arguably extends the present position under the Data Protection Act 1998 following the “striking down” of section 13(2) by the Court of Appeal in the Vidal Hall case. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:59 am
This confirms and arguably extends the present position under the Data Protection Act 1998 following the “striking down” of section 13(2) by the Court of Appeal in the Vidal Hall case. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:59 am
This confirms and arguably extends the present position under the Data Protection Act 1998 following the “striking down” of section 13(2) by the Court of Appeal in the Vidal Hall case. [read post]
