Search for: "Valeo S. A."
Results 141 - 160
of 316
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2014, 9:12 am
Valeo was basically right both in upholding limits on campaign contributions and in striking down limits on independent expenditures — but I very much look forward to his posts. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Valeo. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 7:44 am
Valeo and the first time the Court has struck down a core federal contribution limit. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:20 am
Valeo, under which the Court applies stricter First Amendment scrutiny to expenditure limits than it does to contribution limits. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:17 am
As the Court’s decision in McCutcheon v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:49 am
Valeo altogether because “[c]ontributions and expenditures are simply ‘two sides of the same First Amendment coin’” and the Court’s “efforts to distinguish the two have produced mere ‘word games’ rather than any cognizable principle of constitutional law” (quoting Chief Justice Burger’s partial dissent in Buckley). [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:31 am
Valeo . . . for now, at least. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 4:40 am
Valeo, 424 U. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 5:16 pm
Valeo] as serving the permissible objective of combatting corruption. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 2:46 pm
Valeo in 1976, affirming some limits on campaign contributions to avoid corruption, but holding that political donations receive substantial First Amendment protection, the opinion was written by liberal stalwart William Brennan, and was thought too weak by the ACLU. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 2:35 pm
” Overturning Buckley v Valeo’s holding on aggregate limits: In overturning the 1976 U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:15 am
Valeo) that gives contributions less constitutional protection than spending during campaigns. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
Valeo decision, the Court devoted only three sentences to upholding aggregate campaign limits. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 8:48 am
Valeo, which distinguished spending one's own money from contributing money to someone else.Buckley is a rule without a rationale. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 12:00 am
Valeo, in allowing the government’s anti-corruption interest to justify contribution limits, didn't specify a particular meaning of "corruption." [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 2:17 pm
Valeo, liberals opposed the government’s use of federal campaign laws while conservatives applauded it. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 8:42 am
Valeo in 1975. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 10:07 am
Valeo and McConnell v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 9:51 am
Valeo, liberals opposed the government’s use of federal campaign laws while conservatives applauded it. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 4:31 am
S. [read post]
