Search for: "Vote v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 9,411
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 5:50 am
He saw a United States in turmoil after the January 6th Capitol attack, under former President Donald Trump. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm
Constitutional Rights Constitutional rights refer to the rights bestowed upon everyone by the United States and Minnesota constitutions. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
As Hasen recounts (p. 23), the Supreme Court shamefully refused to intervene in Alabama’s blatantly racist denial of voting rights in Giles v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm
Peter V. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
And there are perhaps more opportunities and flexibility to vote in the United States in the twenty-first century than ever before. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am
You had Donald Trump, the President of the United States, lying about Section 230 over and over again. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
If one compares the United States Constitution with the fifty state constitutions, let alone most modern foreign constitutions, it is easily the least democratic constitution in the mix. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
He maintains that the presence of an amendment affirmatively guaranteeing the right to vote would de-escalate the “voting wars” of the last twenty years and greatly reduce the (ridiculous and wasteful) amount of litigation that accompanies elections in the United States. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
If the United States walks away, it will put Ukraineat risk. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 4:36 pm
ChileSáez v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 1:55 pm
Across the United States, a growing number of states prohibited transgender youths from obtaining gender-affirming health care, and some restricted access for transgender adults. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
The agency explained that the ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
Since the early 1930s – when theorists in the United States began arguing over the corporate objective – legal restrictions and requirements have dramatically limited those choices, largely for the benefit of stakeholders who are not shareholders. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:57 pm
(Indian Civil Rights Act; Tribal Court) United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:56 am
Her trailblazing accomplishments have been recognized on the floor of the 116th United States Congress. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:15 am
[The Supreme Court's ruling in Trump v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 6:20 am
… The patchwork that would likely result from state enforcement would sever the direct link that the Framers found so critical between the National Government and the people of the United States as a whole. [read post]
