Search for: "W. T. Grant Company, in the Matter of"
Results 141 - 160
of 936
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2023, 4:22 pm
The matter remains pending before the Supreme Court of India. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 5:55 pm
It appears that Waterstones decided, in the end, that they would stock the book – after being offered an indemnity by Mr Dale’s company, but that W H Smith decided not to stock it. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The appeal considered to what extent, if at all, factual findings made by the General Court of the European Union in the course of its judgment in Case T-691/14 Servier SAS v EU Commission annulling a competition infringement decision of the European Commission are binding as res judicata on English courts. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 7:30 am
At any rate, though, more artful pleading wouldn’t have saved him; he wasn’t quite “independent” enough from FedEx, his sole client, to bring a viable claim under the state’s unfair business practice statute (Debnam v FedEx Home Delivery, September 8, 2014, Kayatta, W). [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd t/a Mylan & Anor, heard 12-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd t/a Mylan & Anor, heard 12-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:30 am
KG had taken the place of the company G. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 1:00 am
Ivey v Genting Casinos Ltd t/a Crockfords (expedited), heard 13 Jul 2017. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 7:58 pm
But details matter. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
The then applicant mentioned in its letter of 10 October 2000 in the proceedings up to grant of the parent application, before the divisional application from which the patent in suit originated had been filed, that “both Mr De Vries and Mr Mooij were bound to a non-disclosure agreement pertaining to the subject-matter of the present European Patent application” […]. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 8:52 am
Because the SCOV is reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we’re in same-standard-as-the-trial-court territory: if there’s no genuine dispute of material fact, and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, then summary judgment is proper—in other words, not a lot of deference to the trial court. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 10:46 am
And this figure could be much higher: In his January 2003 State of the Union address, President George W. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
Accession: if granting a party an adjacent market, is it because we expect the party to have superior ability to enter/manage? [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:04 pm
And: Your local Housing Company will not unreasonably withhold permission. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:04 pm
And: Your local Housing Company will not unreasonably withhold permission. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:11 am
Given the right tools, the location of your people shouldn't matter in order for them to be successful. [read post]
8 May 2019, 7:14 am
Lannett Company, Inc., 2019 WL 1981186, No. 18-cv-07603-WHO (N.D. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:31 pm
The Court granted permission, finding that, although the email was protected by the work-product privilege, the crime-fraud exception to that privilege applied. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 9:42 am
Even when many pundits predict certiorari, it often doesn't materialize (case in point: Oracle v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am
” Which answers matter? [read post]
