Search for: "Wall v. State of California" Results 141 - 160 of 1,292
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Since last Wednesday the legal blogosphere has been busily abuzz about AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 11:36 am by Steve Bainbridge
Secrist also stated that various regulatory agencies had failed to act on similar charges made by Equity Funding employees. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 7:00 am by Lowell Brown
Olson and Boies, who worked as opposing counsel in Bush v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Department of Homeland Security] This is really something: argument that maybe it’s unconstitutional to have too conservative a Supreme Court [David Orentlicher, PrawfsBlawg] High court should review whether California state commission can force grape growers to pay for industry ads [Ilya Shapiro and Michael Finch on Cato amicus seeking cert in Delano Farms v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 2:22 pm by Ilya Somin
The first was that sanctuaries beat the administration at the Supreme Court in June of that year; technically, the justices declined to hear United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am by Rachel Sachs
Other coverage continued to focus on some of the other amicus briefs filed in Hollingsworth and United States v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:22 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court to butt out of their dispute with Arizona over how California imposes its taxes on some of this state’s residents and businesses. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 8:42 am by Eric Goldman
The California Age-Appropriate Design Code (AADC) is a “think of the kids” law that nominally purports to protect kids’ privacy. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:39 pm
Thus, a ruling by a California state trial court, granting summary judgment to Domino’s on the injured employee’s claims, was reversed.The injured employee claimed that both the franchisee and Domino’s were the employers of the harassing employee and were vicariously liable for his actions under the doctrine of respondeat superior. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:50 pm
In the Wall Street Journal, Mark H. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
” In the California Lawyer, Traci Park anticipates the Court’s decision in Elonis v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 8:45 am by Melanie Notari and Elizabeth G. Litten
Although HIPAA does not provide a private right of action, the lawsuit alleges negligence, invasion of privacy, and violations of three California state laws: (1) the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act, (2) the California Consumer Records Act, and (3) California’s Unfair Competition Law. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:56 am by Tom Smith
The ABA literally forced an unwilling law school to engage in preferential admissions, in violation of Grutter v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 11:58 am by Unknown
State of Utah (Jurisdiction)Ak-Chin Community v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am by Mary Whisner
FentonThe Entry of Women into Wall Street Law Firms: The Story of Blank v. [read post]