Search for: "Warner v. WARNER COMPANY" Results 141 - 160 of 921
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2017, 9:01 am by Matthew Savage Aibel
Infosys, an IT services company, bid on a job from Time Warner Cable (“TWC”) that had been serviced by a competitor, Acclaim. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 9:01 am by Matthew Savage Aibel
Infosys, an IT services company, bid on a job from Time Warner Cable (“TWC”) that had been serviced by a competitor, Acclaim. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 9:01 am by Matthew Savage Aibel
Infosys, an IT services company, bid on a job from Time Warner Cable (“TWC”) that had been serviced by a competitor, Acclaim. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 5:23 pm by Scott M. Pearson
Democratic Senator Mark Warner has introduced a bill, S.1642, that would override the Second Circuit’s decision in Madden v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 7:59 am
  Comcast and Time Warner now control half or more of all U.S. cable subscribers. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:30 am by Terry Hart
Justices Leave Door Open to Discovery Rule Copyright Damages — Bloomberg Law’s Kyle Jahner writes about yesterday’s Supreme Court decision in Warner Chappell Music v. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The City awarded cable franchises in Manhattan to Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
.* Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 4: harmony between parties in ‘lyrical’ patent disputeLast Thursday, Jeremy reported a High Court Order obtained by Warner-Lambert (part of the Pfizer group) mandating the NHS to release guidance about the prescribing of pregabalin (Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group PTC EHF & Others[2015] EWHC 485 (Pat) (02 March 2015)) [on which see the IPKat earlier posts, here and here]. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 10:40 am by Stone Law, P.C.
  Fortres Grand sued Warner Bros. for trademark infringement for not only the movie but two websites Warner Bros. made for Rykin Data, the fictitious company which developed Clean Slate in the movie. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 3:08 pm by Kit Walsh
Disney and other entertainment companies, including Fox and Warner Brothers, argued that providing this service violates copyright law and the related law against bypassing access controls in Section 1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. [read post]