Search for: "Waters v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 10,774
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2024, 12:36 pm
Gulf-Inland, L.L.C. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:07 am
In Minister of Agriculture v Bluelilliesbush Dairy Farming (270/07) [2008] ZASCA 60 (29 May 2008), the Supreme Court of Appeal considered compensation following an outbreak of bovine tuberculosis where 7 000 cattle were slaughtered by the State in terms of the Act. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 10:22 am
Black Hills Clean Water All. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 11:07 am
Reich v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am
Klamath Water Users Prot. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 3:27 am
We feel the rules on lead in water should be part of the Tolerable Standard so that all owners are required to comply. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 1:20 pm
Johnson (Criminal Jurisdiction; Tribal Court) United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:52 pm
US Bank v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
Kirtz and Murray v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:40 pm
Taamneh and Gonzalez v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 am
United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:27 am
In Eze v Adderley Body Corporate (https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAWCHC/2024/7.html), the court answered this question in the affirmative. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:59 am
Smotherman, Reading Between the Wines: Granholm v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:21 pm
Class V. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 11:29 am
FCC, further muddied the waters. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:56 pm
Facts: This case (Waters v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
Cir. 2012) (quoting United States v. [read post]
