Search for: "Waters v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 5,318
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2008, 1:42 am
United States, at least so far as recognition of ecosystem services is concerned. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:46 am
The United States, pursuant to the Federal Government’s constitutionally enumerated power to make treaties, ratified the treaty in 1997. [read post]
28 May 2014, 6:09 am
” This right was first recognized in 1906 by the United States Supreme Court in Winters v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 5:09 pm
CRS – Statement of Charles V. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 12:36 pm
EPA, ruling that federal jurisdiction over wetlands under the Clean Water Act (CWA or the Act), which prohibits discharging pollutants into “the waters of the United States” (WOTUS), extends to only those wetlands with a continuous surface connection to WOTUS. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:35 am
Most drinking water in the United States comes from drinking water systems that are regulated under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:09 am
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006). [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 9:52 am
The United States and the State of Missouri filed this enforcement action against the Metropolitan St. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 1:54 pm
United States, the Supreme Court limited the scope of the Clean Water Act's protection of "navigable waters" to only include those bodies of water that are "permanent, standing or continuously flowing," and thus did not apply to channels through which water flows only some of the time. [read post]
8 May 2020, 11:19 am
The NWPR replaces the Obama Administration’s “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS) rule. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 9:00 am
Feb. 2, 2017), the United States District Court in the Eastern District of Michigan granted motions to dismiss complaints that alleged that state officials had violated residents’ constitutional rights by exposing them to contaminated water. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 12:00 pm
Wilkie case was heard at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit by a full panel of judges (en banc) and that means it has precedential effect (it can be used as law and binding on future issues). [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
” Definition of “Waters of the United States” — Recodification of Pre-Existing Rules, 84 Fed. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:37 am
Lumpkin On May 31, 2016, the US Supreme Court ruled in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 3:17 pm
The case is State of Ohio, et al., v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 8:46 am
Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U.S. 159 (2001); United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 11:17 am
At least twenty United States rivers are currently subject to interstate compacts. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 5:03 am
Here: US Opening Brief Pueblos Amicus Brief New Mexico Brief Jemez River Basin Water Users Coalition Brief Association of Community Ditches of Rio San Jose Amicus Brief El Rito Ditch Asociacion Amicus Brief US Reply Pueblo Intervenors Reply Lower court materials here. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 9:02 am
While the CWA defines the term “navigable waters” as “waters of the United States, including the territorial seas,” the precise scope of “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) has been subject to frequent litigation. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:17 pm
United States (2015), Supreme Court precedent which narrowed the legal definition of public corruption Skilling v. [read post]
