Search for: "Watts v. State.(2)" Results 141 - 160 of 292
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2010, 11:32 am by Daithí
Jacobsen v Katzer, now settled), or the EULA issues raised in MDY v Blizzard and the issues highlighted through Amazon’s Orwellian mess. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 8:30 am by Joy Waltemath
On August 2, a federal judge in Iowa ordered the EEOC to pay $4.69 million in attorneys’ fees and costs incurred by trucking giant CRST in defending against the agency’s sweeping sexual harassment suit, due in part to the agency’s failure to investigate, issue a reasonable cause determination, and conciliate the claims of a number of putative class members (EEOC v CRST Van Expedited, Inc, August 1, 2013, Reade, L). [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 3:22 pm by Giles Peaker
The case also perhaps answers J’s question in the Fairbairn post – what is the ongoing significance of Sella House Ltd v Mears [1989] 1 EGLR 65, after Assethold Ltd v Watts [2014] UKUT 537 (LC) and Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36 in the Supreme Court (which we haven’t done yet!). [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 3:31 pm by Kalvis Golde
United States 22-118Issues: (1) Whether the jury clauses of Article III and the Sixth Amendment or the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment bar a court from imposing a more severe criminal sentence on the basis of conduct that a jury necessarily rejected, given its verdicts of acquittal on other counts at the same trial; (2) whether the Supreme Court‘s decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 9:32 am by Thom Lambert
United States, 559 F.2d 1258 (4th Cir. 1977); Atkins v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 6:26 am by Just Security
Analyzing State Employment Authorization for Noncitizens in the US by Ahilan Arulanantham (@ahilan_toolong) FISA Surveillance Reform The Year of Section 702 Reform, Part V: The HPSCI Majority FISA Working Group Report by Elizabeth Goitein (@LizaGoitein) and Noah Chauvin (@NoahChauvin) Biden Administration: Spy Tools The Biden Administration Should Continue Rebuffing NSO Group’s Latest Lobbying Efforts by Talya Nevins, Nicole Mo and Carrie DeCell (@cmd_dc) Supreme Court Ethics… [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 8:59 pm
Co., No. 08-30465 In a parens patriae action alleging violations of Louisiana's antitrust laws, denial of plaintiff's motion to remand the case back to state court after removal to federal court pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act is affirmed where: 1) the Louisiana attorney general has power to bring parens patriae antitrust actions and possesses broad powers to vindicate the interests of the state; 2) the policyholders and not the state are the… [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]