Search for: "Weintraub v Weintraub" Results 141 - 160 of 166
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2009, 4:13 am
"The Court of Appeals said that §803(d) has not been read as a limitation on the witnesses DOI may subpoena, citing Matter of Weintraub v Fraiman, 30 AD2d 784, aff'd 24 NY2d 918.The Weintraub decision holds that DOI's inquisitorial power "reaches any person, even though unconnected with city employment, when there are grounds present to sustain a belief such person has information relative to the subject matter of the investigation. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 1:05 pm
” The test, as stated by the Supreme Court in Gottschalk v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 1:05 pm
” The test, as stated by the Supreme Court in Gottschalk v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 1:31 am
§512(c)(3)(A)(v)). [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 12:07 am
We're the government, and we're here to copy - Blueport Co. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:27 pm
Millemann of Weintraub Genshlea Chediak in the firm's IP Law Blog State found liable for beating on UT campus - Tennessee lawyer John Day of Day & Blair in his blog, Day on Torts ESOPs and company stock matches to 401(k): the Bear Stearns lesson - Lancaster attorney Michael Moore of Russell Krafft & Gruber in the firm's Pennsylvania Employment Law Blog Government reply briefly field with Supreme Court in Murphy v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 9:23 am
  James Kachmar is a Senior Associate in Weintraub Genshlea Chediak’s litigation section. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 11:59 am
  They report on the recent class certification in National Federation of the Blind v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 5:31 am
Weintraub has written a fairly critical  note on the House of Lords judgment in Harding v Wealands  in the current issue (Spring 2007) of the Texas International Law Journal, entitled, “Choice of Law for Quantification of Damages: A Judgment of the House of Lords Makes a Bad Rule Worse” (42 Tex. [...] [read post]