Search for: "Welcome v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 6,271
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2023, 5:29 am
In recent years this has led to the welcome demise of some of the "extra criteria" for the novelty of certain types of invention, as confirmed by a number of Board of Appeal decisions this year on subranges, undisclosed disclaimers and selections from lists. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm
Secondly, it claims, in effect, that the Master of the Rolls’ private researches demonstrates the law, as stated in the leading text book, to be not only wrong but unarguable. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 11:21 pm
Zealous advocacy has been invoked in the legal profession as an excuse for unprofessional behavior,” the comment would state.The comment would refer to a 2000 Supreme Court decision, The Florida Bar v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm
Please join us in welcoming Jon to our firm. **** Q4 Matters SEC Charges Kraken for Operating as an Unregistered Securities Exchange. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
As always, I welcome your comments below. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
As always, I welcome your comments below. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 5:56 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 12:18 pm
(See Gallo v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:09 am
Stated alternatively, “Why do we infer ownership from possession? [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 4:54 am
” Biden said, “this government in Israel is making it very difficult,” adding that Israel “cannot say no” to a Palestinian state. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 1:29 am
Final thoughtsThe Board of Appeal decision in T 1356/21 is another welcome reinforcement of the case law that "purposive selection" has no place in novelty analysis. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
This initiative is to be welcomed. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am
Cross-disciplinary and comparative papers are particularly welcomed. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 5:35 am
Commentary This decision was welcomed as the dawning of a new era for AI-related inventions. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
First, the Court is competent to review restrictive measures adopted under Article 29 TEU, within the meaning of the CJEU case law (i.e., measures of individual scope of application; see Ben Ali v Council, para. 145) in the annulment procedure (Article 263(4) TFEU). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:31 am
Voting is now open! [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:36 pm
Imam, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Croydon (2023) UKSC 45 Full transparency – I acted for Crisis on an intervention in this case. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:24 am
By Alexandra Even Banksy’s anonymity is as a part of his brand as his art. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 6:04 am
Hong KongHKSAR v. [read post]
