Search for: "Wells v. U.s.*"
Results 141 - 160
of 9,475
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
In Weber, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
It also requires consideration of the conventional wisdom about who benefits from litigating in federal court and how that informs litigation strategy, as well as very recent legislative initiatives aimed at unveiling the beneficial owners of LLCs.Federal v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
" Our fears were well founded. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Apple Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 1:56 pm
Instead, in Harris v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am
" Trump's brief on the merits in the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 9:50 am
Q v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
Trump concedes, as he must (Br. at 24-25), that the President is an “officer” for purposes of the Constitution.[1] After all, the Constitution refers to the President’s “office” or to the “Office of the President” almost two dozen times.[2] He insists, however, that the qualifying phrase “of the United States” in Section 3 serves to exclude the President, as well as the Vice-President, Senators and House… [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:24 pm
From Shen v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am
M'Clung v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court as well. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 10:05 am
Pereira v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
” In the 2012 touchstone decision Arizona v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am
It'll come as little surprise to most Balkinization readers that I agree that Trump’s conduct on January 6, 2021, as well as his other efforts to scuttle the 2020 election results (and other acts, as well), were high crimes or misdemeanors that warranted conviction and his disqualification from holding future federal office, whether or not his conduct amounted to engaging in an insurrection. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:07 am
See Jordon v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm
How do the NetChoice cases relate to Murthy v. [read post]