Search for: "Wells v. US Administrator of Veterans Affairs" Results 141 - 156 of 156
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2022, 4:40 am by Emma Snell
“The American administration forbids its wards in Kyiv to even think about talks with us, and evidently forces them to fight to the last Ukrainian,” Zakharova told reporters. [read post]
For example, a contractor selling medical devices to the Department of Veterans Affairs may fall under different safeguarding and reporting requirements than a contractor providing cloud services for an educational agency or a state university. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 5:00 am by Dan Maurer
The final two months of 2018 have been a remarkably eventful period for observers of American civil-military relations—even for the Trump administration. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:04 am
The lawyers point out that the Authorization for the Use of Military Force in Afghanistan, passed in 2001, says nothing explicit about detention powers, and that the Supreme Court, in cases such as Hamdi v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
This has been well-documented. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:53 pm by Gretchen Goetz
” School administrators also seemed to be unaware that LFTB was in products being served to students, according to the emails. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 6:36 pm by Josh Blackman
Trump could test even the most hard-bitten veterans of politics and destroy reputations. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
The two companies will also pay a combined $3.3 million civil penalty to the United States as well as to Alabama and Louisiana, and $200,000 to Louisiana organ [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The EO directs DHS to publish security requirements, rules, regulations, standards, and interpretive guidance that address the unacceptable risk posed by restricted transactions based on the Cybersecurity and Privacy Frameworks developed by the National Institute of Standards, as well as directing DOJ to issue enforcement guidance. [read post]