Search for: "Wesley v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 531
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2018, 8:58 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Huffman’s article Margin of Error: Potential Pitfalls of the Ruling in The Prosecutor v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:32 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Some win their appeals pro se, which is noteworthy because they are not lawyers and face off against highly skilled state lawyers. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 6:09 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That litigation will continue, thanks to the Court of Appeals, which finds her second lawsuit against the City of Syracuse states a plausible claim for discrimination.The case is Dotson v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 3:20 am by Barry Sookman
The court in Wesley dba MTLFREETV.com v Bell Canada et al 2017 FCA 55 easily rejected this attempt to re-argue the evidence stating: The appellants do not challenge the Federal Court’s finding with respect to the first prong of the test. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 5:54 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals says a jury must decide if the state violated his due process rights.The case is Proctor v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 6:50 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
”The Second Circuit (Katzmann, Carney and Wesley) says the state courts got it right in finding the government had an excellent reason for closing the courtroom. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 2:24 pm by Daily Record Staff
In 2015, Wesley filed a motion titled: “Motion to Vacate the Conviction/Judgment Under the Court’s Supervisory Power Pursuant to Maryland ... [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 6:51 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But, the Court of Appeals (Katzmann, Wesley and Carney) says, more recent precedent guides this case, Crawford v. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 9:26 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In other words, if the state of the case law was fuzzy at the time, the defendants win the case since they cannot be expected to know the state of the law the way a law professor or some other legal expert would. [read post]