Search for: "White v. Office of Personnel Management"
Results 141 - 160
of 201
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2012, 11:10 am
” Williams v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 9:38 pm
Office of Personnel Management that the 1996 federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 1:52 pm
The Justice Department does not mention it at all in a new petition filed Tuesday challenging DOMA in a California case (Office of Personnel Management v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 9:25 am
Yet none but a clairvoyant could have predicted the aftermath on June 15, 1982 when the Supreme Court in Plyler v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:51 pm
Office of Personnel Management, 699 F. [read post]
27 May 2012, 2:56 pm
Office of Personnel Management (N.D. [read post]
10 May 2012, 12:36 pm
The Supreme Court’s decision in McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:22 pm
Office of Personnel Management (Circuit dockets 12-15388 and 12-15409), is here. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:01 pm
Office of Personnel Management) that Section 3 of DOMA violated equal protection standards, regardless whether the District Court applied a heightened level of scrutiny or applied the rational basis standard. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:12 pm
District Judge Jeffrey White ruled in Golinski v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:42 pm
Office of Personnel Management, Jeffrey Steven White, Jeffrey White, Judge Jeffrey S. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 6:47 am
United States Office of Personnel Management. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:08 pm
Office of Personnel Management (District Court docket 10-257). [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:59 am
” United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am
Although he had taken the oath of office as a Supreme Court justice on October 4, recently appointed Justice Abe Fortas, according to the Court’s announcement, “took no part in the review of the petition. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm
Back when I was a summer associate at White & Case, we used to talk about SEC v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
United States Office of Personnel Management (No. 10-00257). [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
United States Office of Personnel Management (No. 10-00257). [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
After considering evidence about a conversation that husband purportedly had with one of its employees, the Office of Personnel Management affirmed, stating that husband could have elected to receive a reduced lifetime annuity with survivor benefits for a new wife only by notifying OPM of his intentions in a signed writing within two years of his marriage, 5 U.S.C. 8339(k)(2)(A). [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 11:09 am
Office of Personnel Management and responded to GLAD’s motion for summary judgment. [read post]
