Search for: "Wiggins v. Wiggins" Results 141 - 160 of 292
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2013, 5:25 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Wiggins, 89 N.Y.2d 872, 873, 653 N.Y.S.2d 91, 675 N.E.2d 845 (1996), where defense counsel arrived at the grand jury after the indictment had been voted. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 6:34 am by Just Security
by Kai Wiggins Office of Legal Counsel / Transparency The Office of Legal Counsel Discloses Classified List of Opinions in Important Step for Transparency by Mayze Teitler (@amteitler) Russia and Kyrgyzstan Democracy  The US Can — and Must — Counter Russian Influence Undermining Kyrgyzstan’s Democratic Progress  by Joshua Russell and Jasmine D. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:04 pm by Katherine Pompilio
The Supreme Court has voted to overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 11:24 am by Justin Walsh
” Read more: http://www.theolympian.com/2010/06/08/v-print/1265042/trial-lawyer-wants-to-take-on.html#ixzz0qNhHRlYs?? [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Chris Seaton
In fact, as the Supreme Court opined in Reed v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiff’s allegations of “intentional harm,” which the Supreme Court properly interpreted as stating a cause of action alleging prima facie tort, were unsupported by facts demonstrating that the defendants acted with “malicious intent or disinterested malevolence” in the prior action (Ahmed Elkoulily, M.D., P.C. v New York State Catholic Healthplan, Inc., 153 AD3d 768, 772; see Dorce v Gluck, 140 AD3d 1111, 1112; Wiggins &… [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 9:09 pm
"  Lawyers: Sabrina Houlton, Joseph Martini, Wiggin and Dana LLP, (defendant); AUSAs John Zach, Katherine Polk Failla [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Nor do we believe that our decision will lead to unpredictability or confusion given that it reiterates the proposition that bare legal conclusions in a pleading are not entitled to consideration when assessing a motion to dismiss under CPLR 3211 (a) (7) (see Myers v Schneiderman, 30 NY3d 1, 11 [2017]; Connaughton v Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., 29 NY3d at 141; Maas v Cornell Univ., 94 NY2d 87, 91 [1999]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126… [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 11:42 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Jan 17, 2014) Related posts: “Wiggin Out” Over a Wig Purchase Dispute Leads to Online Defamation – Sanders v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 7:38 am by Joy Waltemath
According to the lead opinion, the religious exemption applied here is constitutionally permissible as well (Ockletree v Franciscan Health System dba St. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 4:03 am
It is well settled, said the Appellate Division, that absent "a written delegation authorizing a deputy or other person to conduct the hearing," the hearing officer did not have jurisdiction to conduct the §75 disciplinary hearing,  citing Wiggins v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 60 NY2d 385, among other decisions. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am by Mark Zamora
Wiggins, 113 Ga. 149 (3) (1884); Bennett v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 3:01 am
Authority to initiate disciplinary action against an employeeMatter of Stafford v Board of Educ. of Mohonasen Cent. [read post]