Search for: "Wilkinson v. U.s" Results 141 - 160 of 257
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am by Marty Lederman
The plaintiffs in Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood argue that federal law compels them to act contrary to their religious obligations, by requiring them to offer (and pay for and administer) employee health insurance plans that include contraception coverage. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
Wilkinson, 544 U.S. 709 (2005) (upholding section 3 of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, which presumptively requires federal prisons to accommodate federal inmates’ religious practices); Amos, 483 U.S. at 329 (upholding Congress’s decision to exempt churches from antidiscrimination laws, even as to employees such as building engineers); Zorach v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Introduction Cuba has been facing increasingly challenging economic problems since the fall of the Soviet Union[1] and the end of the Soviet system of state-to-state based economic activity.[2] In the absence of Soviet aid, and in the face of U.S. political and economic hostility,[3] Cuba has sought new partners and allies.[4] Cuba also has increasingly experimented with innovative ways of organizing economic activity that avoid reducing the paramount power of the State to own and control… [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 9:32 am by Ross Davies
Fischer, 687 F.3d 514 (2d Cir. 2012) - John Gleeson, U.S. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:54 am
She said that much could be learned from the U.S. example, where President Obama has said that IP is the U.S.'s single most important asset and as a result IP features in almost all of the US trade missions. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:38 pm
She said that much could be learned from the U.S. example, where President Obama has said that IP is the U.S.'s single most important asset and as a result IP features in almost all of the US trade missions. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 7:56 pm by Steve Vladeck
  The post criticizes Judge Wilkinson’s view of the adverse incentives that Bivens liability would create. [read post]