Search for: "William T Doe" Results 141 - 160 of 9,565
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
Rybolovlev admitted that it’s hard for him to trust people, but once he does, he trusts them entirely. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm by Marty Lederman
”  “[I]t does seem odd,” he conceded, “that President Trump would fall through the cracks in a sense,” but it “was compromise legislation,” and “[i]n a compromise, everyone goes away miserable. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am by Josh Blackman
He didn't mention any executive branch authority, including opinions from William Rehnquist and Antonin Scalia. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Respectfully, we also write to raise serious concerns about the reliability of Professor Lash's writings on Section 3 and to make clear what the historical record does—and does not—say.[1] By answering seven questions, we will show that (1) there was a First Insurrection, (2) John B. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:21 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Stockholders Litigation, held that the percentage awarded does not decline in mega-settlements. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
But it does nothing to address what the death penalty does to those who administer it or the profound problems that plague it in Oklahoma and everywhere the state kills.Follow @ljstprof Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
When the 14th Amendment was ratified, he contends, there weren’t any former presidents who had supported the Confederacy, so the drafters would not have had any reason to exclude the president from serving again. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 5:00 am by Beatrice Yahia
Samia Nakhoul, Dan Williams, and Matt Spetalnick report for Reuters. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 4:43 am by Beatrice Yahia
” Abigail Williams reports for NBC News. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
 The upshot: so long as a defendant says what the SEC wants to hear (or says nothing at all), he does not violate the No-Admit-No-Deny Provision. [read post]