Search for: "Williams v. True" Results 141 - 160 of 2,390
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2023, 3:36 am by SHG
in the grand scheme of reviled Supreme Court justices, William Rehnquist was no Roger Taney. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am by INFORRM
The High Court found that the accusations were not substantially true and amounted to a “hyperbolic and vitriolic smearing of Mr Packham” [163]. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
This is especially true as more people realize the value of solid journalism. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
In Hay v Cresswell [2023] EWHC 882 (KB) handed down on 26 April 2023, Mrs Justice Heather Williams held that a sexual abuse victim, Nina Cresswell, had successfully defended a libel claim brought by the perpetrator, William Hay. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
 As for the others, Tobin receives credit for offering Calabresi “liberal insights,” as well as for teaching him that what “might be true in theory . . . doesn’t work in practice” (a lesson that Calabresi brought from Tobin’s macroeconomic terrain into the realm of microeconomics) (OI, v.1, 170-71). [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
And as is true of many (though of course not all) of Justice Kennedy’s core constitutional instincts, his instinct against ISL was dead right. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
On the same days, Heather Williams J heard the libel trial in the case of Mehmood v Up and Coming TV Limited. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
McSweeney Quotes at William & Mary Law. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 6:36 pm by Josh Blackman
Concerning private pacts, Biskupic does a flashback to NFIB v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:45 am by Laurence H. Tribe
There is little doubt that Dominion’s suit for damages met and indeed exceeded the standard the Supreme Court established in 1964 in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:33 am by Andrew Koppelman
That’s true of all lawyers, but it’s particularly pertinent to those who are trying to advance social change. [read post]