Search for: "Wine v. Wine"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,638
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2018, 4:50 am
For example, 27 CFR 4.35(a)(2)(v) defines “vinted”—when used in the name/address statement on the label—to mean that “the named winery, at the stated address, subjected the wine to cellar treatment in accordance with §4.22(c). [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:15 am
In Kattenburg v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 3:40 am
Franciscan Vineyards, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 2:58 pm
The case is TI Beverage Group, Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 10:06 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - Judge Tanya Walton Pratt (pictured) of the Southern District of Indiana struck a response brief in the matter of Wine & Canvas Development, LLC. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 12:26 pm
Oral Argument in case: ; Anthony Collins v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
Applicant unsuccessfully argued, based on its interpretation of the CAFC's decision in Palm Bay Imports, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 6:19 am
Miller Brewing Co. makes a clean sweep for Ohio distributors of beer and wine, as the Sixth Circuit also issued decisions in favor of distributors in Bellas Company v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 2:58 am
Heald and Family Winemakers of California v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 8:24 am
Maxwell’s Pic-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:46 pm
The case cite is Pacific Rim Winemakers, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 4:06 am
The Durban High Court handed down its decision in Distell Ltd v KZN Wines and Spirits CC (10006/2011) [2013] ZAKZDHC 25 on 23 May 2013.Distell is the holder of the KNIGHT’S GOLD and KNIGHTS marks registered in class 33 which covers alcoholic beverages, including whiskey. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:06 pm
LLC v. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 9:22 pm
On February 13, the Ninth Circuit reversed the Central District of California in the trademark infringement case of The Grateful Palate Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:22 am
Case T 420/14 Wine in Black GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Quinta do Noval-Vinhos, SA is a 21 May decision of the General Court of the European Union in a fascinating exercise in comparison of marks for identical goods.In June 2012 Wine in Black applied to register the words Wine in Black as a Community trade mark (CTM) for ‘alcoholic beverages, (except beers), in particular:… [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 3:30 am
A few months ago, I came across Carreras v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 5:42 am
The 7th Circuit's Jan. 17th wine shipping decision, Lebamoff Enterprises v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 7:57 am
Brew 4U, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 1:03 am
Interesting (albeit irritating) liquor law decision out of the Second Circuit: Arnold's Wines Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 1:29 pm
In the recent case of Joel Gott Wines, LLC v. [read post]
