Search for: "Witt v. Witt"
Results 141 - 160
of 852
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2021, 12:15 pm
Patrick McDonnell summarized the oral argument in the Supreme Court’s Collins v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 11:32 am
Jeremy Gordon summarized the oral argument in the Supreme Court’s Hungary v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 11:20 am
Doe I and Cargill, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:57 am
Under current Supreme Court doctrine, Brandenburg v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 8:28 am
” Sedition is a serious charge, but a number of analysts (including Lawfare’s Benjamin Wittes) have raised the possibility that certain conduct related to yesterday’s debacle might meet the terms of the statute. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 9:30 pm
The EU Commission’s rejection of the Hairdressers’ Agreement as well as the decision in European Federation of Public Service Unions (EPSU) and Jan Willem Goudriaan v European Commission, Case T–310/18, 24 October 2019 come to mind. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:36 am
The rights of third-country nationals migrating to the EU have largely been constructed under the terms of Part Three, Title V, Chapter 3 TFEU, particularly arts 78-79 thereof. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:00 pm
We still await the UK Supreme Court’s decision in Uber v Aslam. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 8:43 am
Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of Rational Security in which Benjamin Wittes, Tamara Cofman Wittes, Susan Hennessey and Shane Harris discussed the hack: Benjamin Jensen, Brandon Valeriano and Mark Montgomery explored the strategic implications of SolarWinds. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 10:30 am
” Benjamin Wittes, Tamara Cofman Wittes, Susan Hennessey and Shane Harris discussed the massive computer hacking of U.S. government agencies. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 7:13 am
[iv] The explicit reference to Article IV of the WTO Agreement[v], Article XXIV of GATS[vi] and Article VI:4 of GATS in the recitals to the Decision on Domestic Regulation makes clear the mandate of the CTS – to formulate the necessary disciplines on domestic regulation. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 3:46 am
[1]Alfred C Toepfer Inc v Edokpolor (1965) NCLR 89. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
Invited to discuss her paper on Benjamin Wittes and Kate Klonick’s online daily show, “In Lieu of Fun,” Bazelon faced questions from Wittes on this conjecture: I love a piece that says that there might be a cost for treating free speech as we do in the U.S., Wittes noted, but is there any evidence that those countries with different free speech traditions really are handling the disinformation problem any better? [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 7:52 am
Matthew Kahn analyzed the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Van Buren v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:01 pm
Matthew Kahn analyzed the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Van Buren v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 12:38 am
V. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
1. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:00 pm
Consider the case constantly referred to in decisions this year by courts at both the state and federal level: Jacobson v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 1:17 pm
Indeed, in Burson v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 11:09 am
"] From Straw v. [read post]
