Search for: "Won v. Grant Park 2" Results 141 - 160 of 243
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2011, 12:01 am by Transplanted Lawyer
Supreme Court, which will grant certiorari for an expected oral argument in early 2012. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Attendance is free, but RSVP essential, to emma@hartpub.co.uk or via this link. 24 March 2017, the European Centre for Press and Media Freedom conference on Media Freedom in Strasbourg, entitled: “Promoting dialogue between the ECtHR and the media freedom community” Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 21 December 2016, in the case of Jane Doe 1 and 2 v Dowling ([2016] NSWSC 1909) Campbell J granted an interim injunction to restrain a… [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:47 pm by Richard Hunt
Jan. 19, 2021) the Court granted a stay of a more or less standard website accessibility case pending the 11th Circuit’s ruling in Gil v Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 7:29 am by Richard Hunt
Nov. 15, 2021) is a decision after trial in an otherwise ordinary ADA case involving parking and accessible routes for a convenience store. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am by INFORRM
Julian Assange is due to find out on Wednesday 2 November 2011 whether he has won his High Court appeal against a European arrest warrant and extradition to Sweden to face rape allegations. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am by Graham Smith
In 2000 Mance L.J. said in Hyde Park Residence Ltd v Yelland: “Copyright does not lie on the same continuum as, nor is it the antithesis of, freedom of expression. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 12378-20 Way v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), 6 Children (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 06731-20 Gilbert v the Northern Echo, 1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), 14 Confidential sources (2019), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 09335-19 Dyson Technology Limited v Mail… [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 9:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  You can’t justify IP v. grants or prizes based on efficiency w/o further beliefs, such as beliefs about the dangers & competences of the state. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 11:53 pm by INFORRM
On 14 December 2011, HHJ Parkes QC will hand down judgment in the case of Morrison v Buckinghamshire CC, (heard 20 to 21 July). [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
Hundreds of people were injured and thousands evacuated as a result of the crash on Jan. 6, 2005, when a Norfolk Southern train veered off the main track onto a spur and rear-ended parked railcars. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 4:47 am by Russ Bensing
  See my discussion of last year’s Ohio Supreme Court decision in State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm by Soroush Seifi
  The status quo argument is that judicial discretion is the way to balance the polycentric effects of more compensation to the RP. 2)  Conflict of Interest between the RP and the Rest of the Class in its Clearest Form: The Cy-près Settlement   In Sutherland, Justice Winkler raises the caution that more compensation for the RP who benefits from the class proceeding to a greater extent than the class members beyond the damages suffered by him/her would create an… [read post]