Search for: "Woodrow v. Woodrow"
Results 141 - 160
of 248
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2019, 4:29 pm
Richardsand Woodrow Hartzog, Washington University School of Law and Northeastern University School of Law and Khoury College of Computer and Information Sciences Explanation < Justification: GDPR and the Perils of Privacy, Talia B. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 8:28 am
He was also the single most hostile Justice on the Court to the rights of Chinese Americans, and expressed that opposition in overtly racist terms—including in Plessy v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:17 am
The Supreme Court held, in the Minor v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:52 am
Some major cases like ProCD v. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 3:41 am
In the ensuing case, United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm
”Following Mill, Woodrow Wilson, then a professor at Princeton University, argued that in the constitutional scheme, Congress’s ability to provide what he called “vigilant oversight of administration” was just as important as its legislative power.The Supreme Court generally has agreed with Wilson’s view. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am
Last week’s resolved cases include: Mr John Donovan v Metro, Clause 1, 21/05/2012; Lesley Archer v The Echo (Southend), Clause 1, 18/05/2012; Ms Nicola Searle v South Wales Echo, Clauses 1, 3, 17/05/2012; Mr Liam Fairlie v North Devon Journal, Clause 1, 17/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v Northampton Chronicle & Echo, Clause 1, 17/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v The Sun, Clause 1, 17/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v Daily Mirror, Clause 1,… [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am
Coomber heard 9 and 16 November 2011 (HHJ Moloney QC) El-Naschie v Macmillan, heard 11, 14, 16 to 18, 21, 22, 25, 28-30 November, 1 -2 December 2011 (Sharp J) Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Chambers v DPP, heard 8 February 2012 (Gross LJ and Irwin J) Qema v NGN Ltd heard 29 February and 1 March 2012 (Sharp J) Hunt v Times Newspapers, heard 9 and 12 March 2012 (Eady J) Bento v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire,… [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
There are a number of resolved complaints since last week, including the Met Office v The Daily Telegraph (over the accuracy of claims about the Met’s ability to predict the weather); Richard Ottaway MP v The Daily Telegraph (clause 1, accuracy) and the British Association of Social Workers v Community Care (clause 1, accuracy). [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
(Mrs Laura McQueen v Daily Record, Clause 5, 24/05/2012). [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:24 am
alp v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm
On 28 June 2022, there will be a hearing/application in Emmy Tayler v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm
Resolved complaints include: Mrs Lorna Leckie v The Scottish Sun, Mr Andrew Curtis v The Sun, Dr Kalind Parashar v Daily Mail and Councillor James Moher v Brent & Kilburn Times. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:35 am
Supreme Court cases beginning with Plessy v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am
On the same day, there were hearings in the cases of 2 Wakefield Limited v Persons Unknown, Clarke v Rose and Wolverhampton City Council v Kevin Poole. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:40 am
Resolved cases include: A woman v The People, Clause 1, 3, 6, 07/06/2012; Mr David Wieberg v The Guardian, Clause 1, 06/06/2012; Mary Reid v Daily Record, Clause 1, 01/06/2012; A woman v Kent & Sussex Courier, Clauses 1, 5, 6 31/05/2012; Adam Wood v Yorkshire Evening Post, Clause 1, 30/05/2012; Ms Belinda Cunnison v Berwickshire News, Clause 1, 30/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v Daventry Express, Clause 1, 30/05/2012; Ms Helen Belcher… [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:48 pm
Applying these considerations to the case of a duty of care, it’s interesting to note the most recent argument in the FTC v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:14 pm
“Tool Without A Handle”: Tools and the Search for Meaning – Part II If you are distressed by anything external, the pain is not due to the thing itself, but to your estimate of it; and this you have the power to revoke at any moment. ~ Marcus Aurelius The last post in this series observed optimal policy thinking aims at allowing people sufficient control over technologies they may use them to apply their own capacities and, in that process, find meaning. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:48 am
Jacobson v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:42 am
In the 1919 case McKinley v. [read post]
