Search for: "Woods v. Johnson" Results 141 - 160 of 284
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Jonathan Wood maintains that Rinehart v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Woods, No. 07-51491 In an appeal of a sentence for distributing crack cocaine, imposition of a supervised-release condition forbidding defendant from residing with any person to whom she was not ceremonially married or related by blood is vacated where the condition was overbroad and involved a greater deprivation of liberty than was reasonably necessary to achieve sentencing purposes. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am by Don Cruse
WOOD COUNTY ENERGY, LLC; WOOD COUNTY OIL & GAS, LTD.; NELSON OPERATING, INC.; DEKRFOUR, INC.; BOBBY NOBLE; EXZENA OIL CORPORATION; DAVID FRY AND PATRICIA FRY, No. 10-0887 Opinion of the Court See my later summary. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:43 pm by John Elwood
Walker, 11-1011, which presents (among other things) the question left open two Terms ago in Wood v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 7:12 am by John Elwood
Johnson, 19-250Issue:  Whether the Sixth Amendment requires that the individualized sentencing proceeding necessary to impose a life-without-parole sentence upon a juvenile homicide offender be a trial by jury. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
Last on our list of old business is a pair of two-time relists: Woods v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
IPSO  13241-21 Wood v Helensburgh Advertiser, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 01139-22 Mehson v Mail Online, 2 Privacy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 02465-22 Gleeson v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), No breach – after investigation 02466-22 Gleeson v mirror.co.uk, 1 Accuracy… [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter… [read post]