Search for: "Works v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 68,288
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Hensel Phelps v. San Diego interprets what is a Public Work for the Application of Prevailing Wages.
2 Aug 2011, 11:45 am
In Hensel Phelps Construction Co. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 7:20 am
The issue was that he had not worked in the state of Connecticut. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 6:12 am
Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 12:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 11:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 10:27 am
However, the case is well set up for the State's appeal of this issue, so good work on the part of the Collin County appellate prosecutors. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:55 pm
The facts of Madigan v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 7:54 am
United States. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 7:54 am
United States. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 7:56 am
Holding in Art Works, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 5:08 am
State not bound by misinformation provided by a State employee relied upon by the aggrieved individualMatter of Lewandowski v New York State & Local Police & Fire Retirement Sys., 2010 NY Slip Op 00050, decided on January 7, 2010, Appellate Division, Third Department Paul Lewandowski sustained a disabling injury while working as a firefighter. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
Or does it apply to whatever works were copyrighted in the US? [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
Or does it apply to whatever works were copyrighted in the US? [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
Or does it apply to whatever works were copyrighted in the US? [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:30 pm
+ come(v.). [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:00 am
In a previous post, we considered the factual background to the appeals before the Supreme Court this week in the cases of R (MA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, R (A), and R (Rutherford). [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 10:51 am
Regina v Chargot and Others House of Lords “In criminal proceedings against an employer after an accident ot work, it was sufficient for the prosecution to prove merely a risk of injury arising from a state of affairs at work, without identifying and proving specific breaches of duty by the employer. [read post]
