Search for: "York (david) v. Day (charles)" Results 141 - 160 of 210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2023, 5:01 am by Karen Greenberg
Beginning in 1993, he partnered with a New York businessman, Charles Anteby, described by Saifullah as a “White-American from Jewish community[.] [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:38 am by Jack Goldsmith, Ben Miller-Gootnick
“Before Virus Outbreak, a Cascade of Warnings Went Unheeded,” declared the New York Times headline. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:47 pm by lawmrh
And so Conservative barista Charles Krauthammer, almost 40 years later – - – still calls the Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Headlining the 3-day meeting will be the top lawyers for the United Nations and the U.S. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Springfield, MA; Linda Fieldhouse, President) Axillan Corporation (Dover, MA; Charles Debevoise, President) Ayr1, Inc. [read post]
10 May 2022, 4:25 am by Emma Snell
Peter Baker and Emily Cochrane report for the New York Times. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:57 am by Rob Robinson
§ 1920 (PDF) t.co/f6HHAi9a (Latham & Watkins) No Resolution Reached in Pippins v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 11:01 am by Benjamin Bissell
The New York Times has more on the admission. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 5:01 am by Sam Cohen, Alex Vivona
The New York Times reported that France’s reaction is reminiscent of the country’s response to the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm by Jim Sedor
She has said she would not vote to confirm a nominee who was hostile to Roe v. [read post]