Search for: "Younger v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,906
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2016, 8:10 am
In Cisneros v Lopez, 2016 WL 7428197 (D. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 10:00 pm
Two of the referenced employees were significantly younger than him, caught smoking in an area similar to the Old Receiving Department, and not terminated. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 10:00 pm
Two of the referenced employees were significantly younger than him, caught smoking in an area similar to the Old Receiving Department, and not terminated. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:34 am
On 17 to 19 January 2012, the Supreme Court heard an appeal in the case of Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes . [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:42 am
Additional Resources:Stacy M. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 2:30 pm
HABEASWalck v. [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 6:10 am
The Court held in part that "an injunction aimed at controlling or preventing the occurrence of specific events that might take place in the course of future state criminal trials" would lead to the precise federal interference in state judicial proceedings that Younger v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 10:01 am
His first principle — "no compelled speech, thought, or belief" — reminds us of the important precedent set by West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 1:02 pm
The hostility – contrived or otherwise – between Millennials & Generation Z v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 2:54 pm
In Carter v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:07 am
The Court cited Ohio Civil Rights Commission v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
Blogpost 55/2023 In OP v Commune d’Ans, the Court of Justice determined that a rule maintained by a Belgian municipality, which prohibited the showing of any signs of religious faith in the municipal workplace, could be justified by the cause of preserving an ‘entirely neutral administrative environment’. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 11:50 am
Supreme Court handle the appeal in Perry v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:14 am
According to the letter, the subpoenas are actually an effort by Exxon to obtain records it could not get by other means.The attorneys general also cited the Supreme Court’s decision in Younger v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 2:00 am
In Hazelwood School District v Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988), the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:02 am
Earlier coverage of Miller v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 9:29 pm
Supplemental claims for a Fourth Amendment violation were properly cognizable in state court under Younger v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:42 am
The MCAD moved to dismiss on the basis of the doctrine of abstention, as set forth by the Supreme Court in Younger v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:31 am
A trial court rejected these claims and dismissed the lawsuit – Hill-Spotswood v. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 8:44 am
Based on its first-filed state court action, Indiana moved the district court to abstain from exercising jurisdiction pursuant to the principles of Younger v. [read post]
