Search for: "Younger v. Superior Court"
Results 141 - 160
of 167
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2009, 4:41 am
-based fashion designer who operates the "Boudoir Queen" line of clothing, sued Love in Los Angeles County Superior Court, alleging defamation, false light invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, breach of contract and tortious interference with economic advantage(Dawn Simorangkir a/k/a Dawn Younger-Smith a/k/a Boudoir Queen v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 1:19 am
Superior Court Judge John Dangler will sentence him on July 31, probably to a term of probation and community service. [read post]
18 May 2009, 11:29 am
In Van Devent v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 1:50 am
The justices, in Sanders v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 7:26 am
"The ruling is Moreno v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 3:31 am
The Appeals Court sent the case back to Hampden Superior Court for the hearing. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
MooreFederal Appellate Court DecisionsPaul Mollica's Daily Developments in EEO Law here2nd Circuit Carras v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:25 pm
Ed. 2d 49 (2000), and the NJ Supreme Court in Moriarty v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, October 22, 2008 US v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 2:21 pm
(mother) v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 5:30 pm
Mgmt. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Strine notes that Unocal’s board met for eight or nine hours to consider Pickens’ offer — a response to Smith v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 8:47 am
The Court of Appeal disagreed, affirming in an unpublished opinion.Years later, the state Supreme Court decided People v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 4:03 am
The Court of Appeal disagreed, affirming in an unpublished opinion.Years later, the state Supreme Court decided People v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:12 pm
The New Jersey Supreme court last year put the kibosh on the lower courts' overenthusiastic inclinations to apply New Jersey law to everything in Rowe v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 2:27 am
6-12-2008 California:This district's Court of Appeal yesterday rejected a man's claim that the state's sex offender registration law violates equal protection by requiring mandatory registration for individuals who engage in oral copulation with a minor, but not for those who engage in sexual intercourse.Affirming Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Steven D. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
Is it likely the Supreme Court - or the Superior Court in San Francisco, to which this case should be returning for entry of a final order - would grant a stay? [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 8:44 pm
The unpublished (and thus unprecedential) opinion is State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:36 pm
In K.M. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 1:41 pm
The trial judge, Pierce County Superior Court Judge Thomas J. [read post]
