Search for: "Zone v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 5,444
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2024, 3:28 pm
Lustig v City of Laguna Beach, 2023 WL 6370231 (CD CA 8/10/2023) [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 8:05 am
Parker and Kelo v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:35 am
Lustig v City of Laguna Beach, 2023 WL 6370231 (CD CA 8/10/2023) [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 10:51 pm
Moving on to the Court’s next opinion, in State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:22 am
United States, 293 F. 1013, 1014 (D.C. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
As the Supreme Court explained in Wyeth v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:57 am
Chevron v. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 10:39 am
State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 1:16 pm
The Proposed Rule also captures (i) transactions involving certain vacant land that is zoned for residential purposes (or if a building permit has been issued for the construction of a structure designed principally for occupancy by one to four families), and (ii) transactions involving shares in a cooperative housing corporation. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 12:06 pm
Exclusionary zoning is permitted under Euclid v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 8:55 am
Restrictive zoning rules—like single-family zoning—limit neighborhood density. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:35 pm
After all, Missouri v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 6:08 pm
Back in the 1917 case of Buchanan v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 1:52 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act) State of Oklahoma v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 12:05 pm
In its recent decision in Hilltop Group Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 8:02 am
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:10 am
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:00 pm
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:43 am
State v. [read post]