Search for: "Zuckerman v Zuckerman"
Results 141 - 160
of 195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2012, 2:56 am
In light of these triable issues of fact, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendants' motion (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 4:18 am
David Breemer discusses Murr v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 9:01 am
At this blog, Professor Steve Vladeck analyzes Elgin v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 7:30 pm
It was also established in Winegrad v New York Univ. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 7:08 pm
Cir. 2015) Zuckerman c. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:49 pm
Bank of Montreal, 2015 BCSC 695 Zuckerman c. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am
"Once this showing has been made . . . the burden shifts to the party opposing the motion for summary judgment to produce evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to establish the existence of material issues of fact which require a trial of the action" (id.; see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am
"Once this showing has been made . . . the burden shifts to the party opposing the motion for summary judgment to produce evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to establish the existence of material issues of fact which require a trial of the action" (id.; see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:25 pm
Related Cases: Rubin v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:31 pm
Once this showing has been made, the burden shifts to the party opposing the motion for summary judgment to produce evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to establish the existence of material issues of fact which require a trial of the action based on the ruling in the case of Zuckerman v City of New York. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 2:04 am
Estis, a founding partner at Rosenberg & Estis, and Jeffrey Turkel, a partner at the firm, write that with its Oct. 22, 2009 decision in Roberts v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:15 am
This West Chester lawmaker invited her testimony, chair says,” Ohio Capital Journal (July 14, 2021). [2] The Disinformation Dozen (2021), [3] Shaw v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 1:42 am
One aspect of this issue was covered in my post on the case of Ntuli v Donald ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276). [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 6:00 am
Zuckerman v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:27 am
The case is Carri Johnson v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 8:27 am
Additional Resources: Zuckerman v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:24 pm
. * Benkler mentions Sunstein’s experiments on polarisation, but notes that some other work gives different results, and that the difference is that the type of interaction has an impact (i.e. structured v unstructured) * Ethan Zuckerman mentions hybrid models, particularly where trying to avoid excluding people from the process. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 7:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 4:12 pm
Devgan v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:19 pm
We therefore conclude that defendant established its entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and that plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
