Search for: "Zuckerman v Zuckerman"
Results 141 - 160
of 195
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2011, 8:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 11:29 am
Kohn Executive Director, National Whistleblower Center and Founding Member of Kohn, Kohn & Colapinto, LLP Moderated by Jason Zuckerman, Principal, The Employment Law Group [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:49 am
., P.C. v Motor Veh. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:41 pm
In Bonds v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:56 am
The opponent of a summary judgment motion must present admissible evidence that is sufficient to raise an issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 11:41 am
., P.C. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 2:42 am
The panel found in Sullivan v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 12:42 pm
V. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:22 am
Co. v Nationwide Mut. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 3:24 am
Thus, the burden shifted to plaintiff to raise a question of fact requiring a trial (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]; Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065, 1067-1068 [1979]). [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:19 pm
We therefore conclude that defendant established its entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and that plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:09 am
Bloch Zuckerman Spaeder Carl S. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:32 am
Co. v Copfer, 48 NY2d 871, 873).Here, Lexington met its prima facie burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562) by submitting, inter alia, an affirmation of an AIGDC attorney who had handled the Eason claim. [read post]
What the Archimedes' Principle and Empty In-Ground Swimming Pools Have to Do With Insurance Coverage
12 May 2010, 11:12 am
This blawg's discussion of the Javier v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:58 am
Surgicenter, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 6:03 am
In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
See Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 1:46 pm
Elizabeth Zuckerman, an excellent plaintiff's employment lawyer based out of Princeton, NJ, just won an important decision in the case of J.T.'s Tire Service v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 3:05 am
Defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition to the motion (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 6:35 am
In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). [read post]
