Search for: "v. " Results 141 - 160 of 492,901
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2024, 7:17 am by Josh Richman
”  For the brief: https://www.eff.org/document/06-26-2024-eff-et-al-amicus-brief-tiktok-v-garland For EFF’s stance on TikTok bans: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/03/government-hasnt-justified-tiktok-ban  Contact:  DavidGreeneCivil Liberties Directordavidg@eff.org [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”[1] Thus, for example, Graber showed, among his many other myth-busting insights, that Marbury v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 5:10 am by Claire Phipps-Jones (Bristows)
 It seems that Munich has currently provided for the highest levels of penalty payment in its orders for inter partes PIs, of €250,000 per infringement in 10x Genomics v Nanostring, Dyson v SharkNinja and MyStromer v Revolt (ex parte), with other local divisions providing for slightly more modest sums of €100,000 per day in 10x Genomics v Curio (Dusseldorf), €10,000 per product up to €30,000 per day in Ortovox v Mammut… [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:16 am by Benson Varghese
When an Officer Can Order You Out of Your Vehicle In Pennsylvania v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:16 am by Benson Varghese
When an Officer Can Order You Out of Your Vehicle In Pennsylvania v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:16 am by Benson Varghese
When an Officer Can Order You Out of Your Vehicle In Pennsylvania v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:12 am by Eleonora Rosati
The following contribution illustrates the current status of case law in regard to sound marks and provides an outlook on the future of these marks.Distinctiveness of sound marksRegistration of a sound of our everyday life is particularly problematic and also the subject of the CJEU judgment 'Ardagh Metal Beverage v EUIPO' (T-668/19; discussed here). [read post]