Search for: "v. AT&T Mobility" Results 141 - 160 of 5,367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2011, 10:17 pm by Deeptak Gupta
This editorial appears in today's New York Times: Gutting Class Action   The Supreme Court’s 5-to-4 vote in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:48 am
Cochrane [1993] Crim LR 98, which was applied in Ireland in relation to mobile phone records by People (DPP) v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:03 pm
In the case of AT & T Mobility v Concepcion, the Supreme Court ruled that a California's prohibition of allowing corporations to waive class action lawsuit rights was trumped by the Federal Arbitration Act. [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 9:08 am
Verizon Wireless V Cast service costs $15 per month. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of California for further consideration in light of AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:59 am by Matt Murphy
Barton and all the phone companies that responded—AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, T-Mobile, MetroPCS, Cricket, U.S. [read post]