Search for: "v. FARRELL" Results 141 - 160 of 494
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2012, 2:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 "A waiver of the attorney-client privilege may be found where the client places the subject matter of the privileged communication in issue or where invasion of the privilege is required to determine the validity of the client's claim or defense and application of the privilege would deprive the adversary of vital information (see Hurrell-Harring v State of New York, 75 AD3d 667, 668; 601 Realty Corp. v Conway, Farrell, Curtin & Kelly, P.C., 74 AD3d… [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 2:13 pm by Kraft Davies, PLLC
Schoenbaum, Admiralty and Maritime Law § 6-28, at 393 (4th ed. 2004) (citing Farrell v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 7:30 pm by Anna Christensen
News & World Report, John Aloysius Farrell predicts that Kagan will be “a sound, predictable member of the liberal bloc on the U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Farrell’s findings establish beyond question that Nixon was not merely a serial liar, but evil. [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:51 am by John Morken
Ultimately, members of Huguette Clark’s family, represented by Farrell Fritz, filed objections to probate. [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:51 am by John Morken
Ultimately, members of Huguette Clark’s family, represented by Farrell Fritz, filed objections to probate. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:56 am
Co. v Farrell, 57 AD3d 721 [2008]; Delphi Restoration Corp. v Sunshine Restoration Corp., 43 AD3d 851 [2007]; Schulman v Indian Harbor Ins. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 8:24 am
For example, in Farrell v AG [1998] 1 IR 203, the decision of the Attorney General himself to direct the coroner (Farrell) to carry out a fresh inquest was quashed; there was not “a scintilla of evidence … for the complete change of mind”. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Andrew’s affidavit was sufficient to raise a question of fact as to whether the defendant engaged in a course of continuous representation intended to rectify or mitigate the initial act of alleged malpractice (see Melnick v Farrell, 128 AD3d 1371, 1372 [2015]; DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d 809, 812-813 [2011]; Gravel v Cicola, 297 AD2d 620, 621 [2002]). [read post]