Search for: "v. Federal Trade Commission et al" Results 141 - 160 of 531
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
* Washington Redskins' Trade Marks tackled: disparaging, says District CourtJani writes up Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
Phillips of the Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 6:37 am
Two recent English cases, Karen Millen v Karen Millen Fashions Ltd and Skyscape Cloud Services Ltd v Sky Plc, indirectly consider Declarations of Non-Infringement in relation to Trade Marks. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Lina M. Khan
Today [August 11], the Federal Trade Commission initiated a proceeding to examine whether we should implement new rules addressing data practices that are unfair or deceptive. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 5:40 am by Barry Sookman
The order made by Justice Gleeson, in a carefully reasoned decision in Bell Media Inc. et al v GOLDTV.BIZ 2019 FC 1432, ordered certain ISPs in Canada to block access to pirate subscription streaming sites (GoldTV.biz and GoldTV.ca) that were infringing the copyrights of the plaintiffs Bell Media Inc., Groupe TVA Inc, and Rogers media Inc. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:28 pm by Lyle Denniston
At about 11 a.m. on Monday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of oral argument in Morrison, et al., v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 10:01 am by Florian Mueller
There also appear to be interesting issues in the multijurisdictional dispute between Philips and French industrial giant Thales, and this week the Chair of the Federal Trade Commission, Lina Khan, filed a public-interest statement in the investigation of Philips's complaint against Thales and several other defendants. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 12:09 pm by Hadley Baker
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, et al. from July 22-26. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 2:29 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan issued an Opinion and Order in an alleged wage suppression antitrust case certifying a class of over 20,000 Registered Nurses (“RNs”) in Cason-Merenda, et al. v. [read post]