Search for: "A B" Results 1581 - 1600 of 158,358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2024, 8:08 am by Derek Muller
Part III-B focuses on the stare decisis issue, including these paragraphs (lightly revised): We have previously… Continue reading The post Divided Wisconsin Supreme Court reverses its 2022 decision, holds drop boxes are permissible under state law appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 7:50 am by Christine Bontuyan
Japanese Franchises in the US The lines between East and West are blurring faster than ever, and at the forefront of this cultural collision are Japanese franchises. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Re (b), as Vile notes, larger population states are extremely unlikely to issue calls for a convention if there is no apportionment of voting power to state populations within the enabling law (p.121). [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
., 171 AD3d 705, 706 [2d Dept 2019]; Shon v State of New York, 75 AD3d 1035, 1038 [3d Dept 2010]).Footnote 3: Claimant's contention that the taking of the depositions of his medical experts telephonically was improper (see CPLR 3115 [b]) was waived by his failure to object at the time that the depositions were taken (see CPLR 3115 [b]; Matter of Washington v Montefiore Hosp., 7 AD3d 945, 947-948 [3d Dept 2004]). [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
., 171 AD3d 705, 706 [2d Dept 2019]; Shon v State of New York, 75 AD3d 1035, 1038 [3d Dept 2010]).Footnote 3: Claimant's contention that the taking of the depositions of his medical experts telephonically was improper (see CPLR 3115 [b]) was waived by his failure to object at the time that the depositions were taken (see CPLR 3115 [b]; Matter of Washington v Montefiore Hosp., 7 AD3d 945, 947-948 [3d Dept 2004]). [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Clark
Subsection (B) of this statute essentially instructs juries (or the judge if it is a bench trial) to determine the total damages in the case and then assign a percentage of fault to each party who was at fault. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 4:51 am by Guest Blogger
The majority frames 704(b) as a narrow, later-added exception to the more permissive rule 704(a) that abolished the ultimate issue rule. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 4:36 am by admin
It includes the same testing requirement to substantiate claims as the general performance claims provision of the Competition Act (i.e., an “adequate and proper test” as under section 74.01(1)(b)). [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Lee was identified in Englander’s indictment as “City Staffer B” and was accused by the commission of receiving a free hotel stay and $1,000 in casino chips, which Lee lost playing baccarat. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 2:00 am by vrose
The basketball courts are located at Tompkins Square Park, E. 10th Street and Avenue B. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by Stephen Masterson
EDITOR’S CHOICE In an essay in The Regulatory Review, Cary Coglianese, the Edward B. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
The last time I was in Poland was approximately three decades ago. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 6:53 pm by Mark Tushnet
(At least one impeachment resolution invokes this theory.)Is this an example of (a) impermissible linguistic drift or (b) permissible specification of vague constitutional terms within the bounds of reasonable interpretive flexibility? [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 1:31 pm by Daniel M. Kowalski
EOIR, July 2, 2024 "The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) today announced the launch of Respondent Access Portal , a secure online platform that allows unrepresented individuals who have a hearing scheduled before EOIR to view their case information and scheduled hearings online, download their electronic case file, and file documents with the immigration court. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 11:29 am by Goldfinger Injury Lawyers
 10. (2) If subrule (1) does not apply, the court may, on any party’s motion, make an order to transfer the proceeding to a county other than the one where it was commenced, if the court is satisfied, (a)  that it is likely that a fair hearing cannot be held in the county where the proceeding was commenced; or (b)  that a transfer is desirable in the interest of justice, having regard to, (i)  where a substantial part of the events or omissions that gave rise to… [read post]