Search for: "Ace v. State"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 1,884
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2010, 10:00 pm
R (D and M) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; R (EM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] EWCA Civ 18 Read judgment With apologies, this post originally appeared with the wrong title The Court of Appeal has ruled on two linked challenges to the entitlement to welfare benefits of prisoners detained in psychiatric hospitals. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:13 am
Classification of a covenant, therefore, can be outcome-determinative in a state like Georgia.The Court of Appeals agreed with ACS, finding that although the covenant was contained in an employment agreement, it was a condition precedent to the stock purchase agreement between Boyce and the majority shareholder. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
Download Ace American Ins. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:36 pm
This was confirmed by the House of Lords in Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:48 pm
Per Lord Oliver in Abbey National BS v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:48 pm
Per Lord Oliver in Abbey National BS v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 3:11 am
Article 13 The domestic proceedings in this case culminated in the judgment given by the House of Lords in JD v East Berkshire Community Health NHS Trust and Ors [2005] 2 AC 373. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:41 pm
‘‘(v) NARROWEST POSSIBLE SCOPE OFEXCEPTION. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:38 pm
Ltd 1894 AC 8. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 3:59 am
To that extent, the claimant’s case is clearly weaker than, or at least distinguishable from, that of the successful claimant in Lister [2002] 1 AC 215, or of a Roman Catholic boy, such as M, who worked as an altar server at the Church and was abused by Father Clonan. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 10:40 am
At the ACS Blog, Margaret Love reports on Justice Kennedy’s recent comments during oral argument in Dillon v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:14 pm
The Court adopted the description of the Article 8 / 10 balancing exercise given by Lord Hoffmann in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457, at [55] and [56] (a case brought by Naomi Campbell against a newspaper which had published photographs of her leaving a drug treatment session): ‘when press freedom comes into conflict with another interest protected by the law, the question is whether there is a sufficient public interest in that particular publication to… [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 9:11 am
Clontech Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm
This was said to infringe the act of state doctrine, as explained in decisions such as that of the United States Supreme Court in Underhill v Hernandez 168 US 250 (1897) and the House of Lords in Buttes Gas and Oil Co v Hammer [1982] AC 888. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 2:44 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 8:33 pm
United States (1997) (and that lurked behind the decision in Medellin v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 7:32 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Western District of North CarolinaOpinion Date: 2/12/10Cite: ACS Partners, LLC v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 11:05 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 7:16 am
United States and Padilla v. [read post]
