Search for: "BULL V US"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 2,311
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2012, 2:11 am
by Maurizio Borghi Patents Court London, 19 January 2012, Hoffman v Drug Abuse Resistance Education. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 10:54 am
[Newing v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 12:41 pm
Junejo v New Vision TV Limited, heard 24 and 25 March 2021 (Murray J) Miller v College of Policing and another, heard 9 and 10 March 2021 (Sharp P, Haddon-Cave and Simler LJJ) Wright v McCormack, heard 16 and 18 February 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Desporte v Bull, heard 9 February 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Ansari v Amini, heard 10-11 November 2020 (Julian Knowles J) Please let us know if there are other… [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 12:16 pm
The cases, Michael Jordan & Jump 23, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:19 am
OHMI (Class 46) TOPCOM : Likelihood of confusion: Häfele v OHIM – Topcom Europe (Class 46) EXECUTIVE EDITION can be freely used: BSH v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 5:41 am
Assistant US Attorney Kan Nawaday specifically described how “Off to the Hunt” was removed from the National Museum without its frame during World War II. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:37 am
One could for instance think of the Red Bull silver and blue colour mark (heard in the EUIPO Board of Appeal last year in revocation proceedings). [read post]
The Canadian Copyright Board: To Be or Not To Be –That Is A Question – ALAI Conference, May 25, 2016
28 Jun 2016, 2:37 pm
Here are recent example of post-hearing pendency delays before a decision was rendered:• Commercial Radio = ~ 30 months• K-12 I = ~ 24 months• K-12 II = ~ 20 months• Fitness = ~ 26 months• Re:Sound Tariff 8… [read post]
18 May 2007, 5:01 am
This is bull shit. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 9:33 am
The name of the case is Nutt v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 7:52 am
The decision, Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 9:20 pm
To qualify for special tax treatment, transacting parties must file records with their in-charge tax authorities as part of the annual corporate income tax return submission. (1) Special Tax Treatments under Notice 59 • Corporate restructuring transactions that qualify for special tax treatment can be carried out without being subject to any capital gain tax. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
In this week’s case (Miller v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 11:44 am
Lauderdale • Boca Raton [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 10:04 pm
This is bull shit. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 1:14 pm
The October 2, 2012, decision in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:50 pm
Exceptions to disaffirmance: • necessaries • can only be used as shield, not sword • certain labor contracts or IP licenses Children know what they are doing online, and they understand games better than we do. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
INTA was still the USTA and used to attract just 300 or so registrants, against the 9,000+ that attend today. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 8:06 pm
--Notes and Questions --Romer v. [read post]
