Search for: "Battle v. United States" Results 1581 - 1600 of 3,882
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2016, 10:06 am by Michael Price
  Earlier this year, the Second Circuit waded into these waters when an en banc panel decided United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2016, 6:04 pm by Ad Law Defense
Homeopathic medicine was heralded upon its entry into the United States in 1835, primarily because –unlike traditional medicine of the time – it didn’t kill patients (like mercury tinctures) and wasn’t gross (like leaching). [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
So, the plaintiff won a Norwich Pharmacal skirmish, but he emphatically lost the battles over the injunctions. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 3:25 pm by Josh Blackman
The purpose of the penalty, as the government explained to the Supreme Court in NFIB v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 2:11 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States, for example, his opinion for the Court decided whether the search was legal (no) and left it to the lower court to decide whether exclusion was required under existing law. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 4:56 am
| Good news and bad news for bio-pharmaceutical patenting in the United States | HP? [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Yesterday the battle over transgender rights-- which has often had religious overtones-- took a different turn with the filing of a federal court lawsuit by a transgender male from Mexico who was granted political asylum in the United States and who lives in Indiana. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 1:25 pm by Edward Blum
If the new Justice analyzes the current state of minority electoral opportunity in the United States as did Scalia, the new statute probably won’t survive constitutionality. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 11:00 pm by GJEL Staff
Last updated: 10.24.16 People who follow the news in the United States are not strangers to disturbing legal stories that often dominate the headlines. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 8:00 am by Ilya Somin
In the United States today, leaving children unsupervised is grounds for moral outrage and can lead to criminal charges. [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 1:43 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Lopez sued United in State Court alleging his home sustained water damage and that United failed to fully cover the damages. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 1:11 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Courts of Appeals Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2016cta.htmlUnited States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 12:38 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Courts of Appeals Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2016cta.html United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:55 am by Gene Killian
I expect that the battle will now turn to the question of what constitutes covered “consequential damage. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
First, religious liberty in the United States has never been absolute, but rather is hemmed in by the moral imperative to not harm others. [read post]