Search for: "Bear v. State"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 14,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2022, 7:02 am
(Of Louisiana), et al. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:57 pm
" United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:28 pm
Consider, for example, the decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
After centuries of not overturning much of any state or local gun regulation, the Supreme Court issued rulings in 2008 and 2010 that invalidated gun statutes and crystallized an individual right to bear arms. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
In overturning Roe v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:52 am
On the other side are cases like Rumsfeld v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 7:00 am
As the Supreme Court of Canada stated in Crookes v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 5:41 am
Homer v Homer, 2022 WL 4290465 (S.D. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 4:22 pm
TRUMP, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 1:33 pm
But in MOC (by his litigation friend, MG)-v-Secretary of State [2022] EWCA an Upper Tribunal Judge found that capacity was unsuitable as a key element in identifying a “status” for Article 14 as too “potentially evanescent”. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 6:06 am
The ICJ has only considered a State’s responsibility for genocide twice before – the Bosnian Genocide Case judgment of 2007 and Croatia v Servia in 2015. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 7:48 am
A decade ago, Russia’s president, Vladimir V. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 11:40 pm
In Epic Games v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 9:14 am
In the 1973 case of Roe v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 7:52 am
” Enforcement Under the CRA, market surveillance authorities (MSAs), to be designated or created in each EU Member State, have the primary responsibility for enforcement, including through coordinated sweeps of IoT products made available in the EU. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 11:41 pm
Post-Sisvel v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 12:58 pm
(Evans v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 10:36 am
'"] From Magistrate Judge Reid Neureiter's Report and Recommendation yesterday in Huff v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
United States, the U.S. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm
Proponents of the amendment have framed the issue as a response to income inequality, with the surtax advertised as only affecting the wealthiest residents of the Bay State and thus ensuring that the wealthy pay their fair share. [1] This motivation is unsurprising in a state known for its progressive politics, and the Commonwealth’s flat-rate income tax is anomalous in a tax code that otherwise bears the hallmarks of progressive taxation. [read post]
