Search for: "Brown v. Harms" Results 1581 - 1600 of 1,684
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm by Andrew Raff
" Evan Brown, Internet Cases. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Jeffrey Morris
Although only briefly in private practice, Weinstein did serve as a member of the legendary team of attorneys who worked on the appeal to the Supreme Court of Brown v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:26 am by Lyle Denniston
Brown (Circuit docket 10-16696) to offer their views on the impact of the California court ruling on the Article III issue. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 12:55 pm by Victoria Kwan
Without independence, there is no Brown v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:25 pm
of claims from purchase & sale of securities. http://t.co/RvgLduA B-FL: Trustee's actual fraudulent transfer claims survive dismissal by plausibly asserting tsf to further Ponzi scheme. http://t.co/j2tWCXp B-FL reviews Ransom, Lanning & earlier cases in overruling UST obj. to including op. exp. for 3 cars in means test calc. http://t.co/SEGMbcI B-CO: Statutory cap of §502(b)(6)(A) equally applies to claims against guarantors of leases that are in bankruptcy.… [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
“Even taking this testimony in the light most favorable to defendant, defendant has failed to establish that he believed it was reasonably necessary to kill Patterson to save himself from death or great bodily harm. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm by Michael Lowe
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 6:24 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) and the courts should translate foreign terms that are generic or merely descriptive in their home country, because allowing such marks would cause unexpected harms for competition.This is a fascinating paper that warrants serious thinking, and perhaps re-thinking, of how trademark law currently treats foreign terms.What's the harm, we might ask? [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:00 am by Administrator
For example, it counts Vigna v Levant six times (that is, it counts it as six awards) for the purpose of the number of awards, average damages awards etc. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm by Contributor
October 28th of this month will mark the one year anniversary of the publication of the Anti-SLAPP Panel’s Report to the Attorney General on anti-SLAPP legislation. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 7:30 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Justice Brown’s concern was that the majority’s approach abandoned any meaningful constraints on this national concern branch of POGG power. [read post]