Search for: "Brown v. Justice" Results 1581 - 1600 of 5,255
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2019, 9:39 am by Steve Gottlieb
You can look for an admission – “I refuse to give you a job or sell you a house or rent you an apartment because you are Black, brown, or yellow, or because you pray to the wrong God. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 7:40 am by Nicole Saharsky
Nicole Saharsky is co-head of Mayer Brown’s Supreme Court & Appellate Practice. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 2:55 pm by Mark Murakami
 When the application is presented to a judge, the judge shall immediately notify the chief justice of the supreme court of the State, or the senior associate justice in the event of the chief justice's absence or incapacity or a vacancy in the office, who shall forthwith assign two other circuit judges to sit with the circuit judge in hearing and determining the application. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 2:55 pm by Mark Murakami
 When the application is presented to a judge, the judge shall immediately notify the chief justice of the supreme court of the State, or the senior associate justice in the event of the chief justice's absence or incapacity or a vacancy in the office, who shall forthwith assign two other circuit judges to sit with the circuit judge in hearing and determining the application. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 5:30 am by Vishnu Kannan
Preston Lim and Rachel Brown shared the most recent installation of SinoTech, in which they cover developments in U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 9:03 am by Michael Rushford
But the reporter also included Gundy v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 5:52 am by David Mills
Notwithstanding the permissive language of rule 74.15(2), case law suggests that notice should be provided in the absence of “extraordinary urgency” requiring that it be dispensed with. [2] For instance, in Ignani v Ignani, Justice Brown opined that in the absence of extraordinary urgency justifying an ex parte Order for Assistance, the moving party should be required to give notice.[3] In making this statement, Justice Brown considered… [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Mylius was convicted after a one-day trial before the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Alverstone, and a special jury at the High Court. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 6:30 am by Randy Barnett
" Indeed, questions Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kagan asked in 2012 augured, with a remarkable degree of clarity, two issues presented in Texas v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:32 am
And the underlying cause has to do with deep, deep, deep realms of racial injustice, both in our criminal justice system and in our economic system. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 9:39 pm by Heather Douglas
As Justice Brown stated in Bank of Montreal v Faibish, 2014 ONSC 2178, “Why should we be able to expect that treating courts like some kind of fossilized Jurassic Park will enable them to continue to provide a most needed service to the public in a way the public respects? [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
Justices Karakatsanis, Brown and Martin dissent, substantially for the reasons of Sharpe J.A. at the Court of Appeal. [read post]