Search for: "California State Bar Court"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 11,179
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
While there are meaningful procedural differences to these cases – a federal district court dismissed Kuciemba for failure to state a claim, whereas the California Court of Appeal denied a writ of mandate to vacate an order overruling a demurrer in See’s – there are many factual similarities. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 12:05 pm
Not that attorney-client relationships are a good idea or allowed anywhere, but some other states will take a much more severe approach, and while the OLR and the Supreme Court look at past discipline to make charging and sanction determinations, in the #MeToo/8.4(g) era we may see a different approach here as well. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 3:42 am
An extension of time was granted in Gluszak v Yeap (No 2) [2021] WASC 283, so that the defendant can counterclaim with respect to publications barred by s.15 of the Limitation Act 2005. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 11:44 am
But then the appellate court reversed, finding the case could proceed, affirming that California state labor laws are stronger than federal statutes in protecting employees’ rights to free speech regarding employers/former employers. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm
In May 2020, the California State Bar Board of Trustees voted to explore similar reforms to expand access to affordable legal assistance. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 11:25 am
Thus, the appellate panel affirmed the district court’s ruling barring the subsequent challenge in litigation. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 6:30 am
State Bar of California], or even overruling Keller and Lathrop [v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 11:57 pm
., client, Earl Snoddy, is resentenced by the state court, making him a free man just 9 months after retaining Barhoma Law, P.C., the leading California Appeals and Post-Conviction law firm. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 7:09 am
., a California federal court recently ruled that a D&O insurer had no duty to defend an investment firm’s $8.5 million employment suit because coverage was barred by the policy’s broad contract exclusion, which applied not only to breach of contract claims but also any claims “arising from” contractual liability owed by the company. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 2:55 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 12:30 pm
Arizona Court of Appeals (2014): Egregious prosecutorial misconduct triggers double jeopardy, thus barring retrial. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 10:56 am
He describes the 150-year history and intended role of civil grand juries (CGJs) in California Superior Courts. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 2:01 pm
It wasn’t sufficient that they were in Spanish; on the La Michoacána package, the court described them as “Spanish translations of English product descriptions,” e.g., “Fresas con Crema”/“Strawberries & Cream” and “Paletas”/“Bars. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 6:30 am
" In Hollingsworth, readers may recall, the Court concluded supporters of California's Proposition 22 (which barred state recognition of same-sex marriage) lacked appellate standing to appeal the Ninth Circuit's decision that the Proposition was unconstitutional. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 1:49 pm
Yellen (CARES Act) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html State of Iowa v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 3:18 pm
United States (1957)…. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 6:48 am
” The “too-many-inventions-are-ineligible” camp includes the IP Law Section of the State Bar of Nevada. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 3:52 am
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Friday ruled that California’s net neutrality law, SB 822, can remain in place, holding the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) 2017 decision to reverse federal internet protections cannot bar state action. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 2:58 pm
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has rejected a legal challenge that attempted to bar enforcement of California's gold standard state net neutrality law. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 11:43 am
The Second Circuit says the district court was correct in barring Gutman from using various iterations of her name “in trade or commerce” while the litigation was pending. [read post]
