Search for: "California v. United States"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 12,562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2023, 5:06 pm
In Briskin v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 3:38 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California have recently released decisions on labor cases among them: Carr v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:12 pm
Martinez v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 11:34 am
Because the State of California was attempting to govern in an area reserved exclusively for federal regulation, the Court held that the California law was preempted. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 11:34 am
Because the State of California was attempting to govern in an area reserved exclusively for federal regulation, the Court held that the California law was preempted. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 12:51 pm
But under Section 209(b), the EPA may grant California a waiver from federal preemption to set its own vehicle-emission standards, in recognition of the fact that California was the only state that regulated emissions before the CAA’s enactment, and in recognition of the fact that at the time California in particular suffered from smog and other emissions issues. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 6:47 am
Miller v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
The 1959 case of Bibb v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 9:50 am
As I have noted before, New Mexico is the only United States jurisdiction that makes polygraph evidence presumptively admissible barring a prior stipulation by the parties. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:13 pm
Concluding that the class claims were not barred as a matter of law, the Bridgeford court relied substantially on the United States Supreme Court decision in Smith v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:00 am
(filed 04/08/13) Amici Curiae Brief of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States et al. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am
Perry and United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 2:37 pm
The full text of the decision can be read by clicking here: HARLICK v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:00 am
See National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:56 pm
In Ortega v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 5:33 pm
United States District Court Judge Susan Illston (Northern District of California) denied certification in a suit by security guards alleging, among other things, failure to provide adequate rest breaks and failure to provide adequate wage statements. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 8:07 am
Baker (1818) 16 U.S. 541, 545); quite recently, it determined that a fish is not a "tangible object" (United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 1:52 pm
(Compel Agency Action; Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act) United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 4:38 am
Two cases whose names may well be connected to one of the most important rulings the Supreme Court will make in our lifetime are United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 6:49 am
United States, 541 U. [read post]
