Search for: "Clark v. State" Results 1581 - 1600 of 3,520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2022, 3:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The “doctrine of judicial estoppel may bar a party from pursuing claims which were not listed in a previous bankruptcy proceeding” (Moran Enters., Inc. v Hurst, 160 AD3d 638, 640 [2d Dept 2018], lv denied 32 NY3d 908 [2018], rearg denied 32 NY3d 1195 [2019]; see Popadyn v Clark Constr. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Clark, Neoclassical Public Virtues: Towards an Aretaic Theory of Law-Making (and Law Teaching), (Virtue in the Law, Forthcoming; Michigan State University Legal Studies Research Paper, Feb. 13, 2010). [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:29 am by Amy Howe
Finally, JURIST’s Jaclyn Belczyk covers Thursday’s decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 3:02 pm by almaraz
Karlan discusses the Supreme Court’s decision in Nguyen v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 7:50 pm by Larry
This comes from a 1984 Court of Appeals decision called Jarvis Clark Co. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 1:30 am
A-23-882774-B, Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County, Nevada. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:18 am by Samuel Sherwood, Olswang LLP
 She stated that, to the extent LLP had committed such defaults, it had done so “on behalf of” Paragon. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:19 pm by Lyle Denniston
Clark — and in a murder case — Brumfield v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 11:24 am
This exception is further explained in Article 15 of the Regulation which states that "lawsuits pending" should be governed by the law of the member state where the relevant lawsuit was commenced and in progress.Mr Justice Christopher Clarke, having considered the Regulation, the Virgos-Schmit report and available European and English authorities, held that arbitration proceedings which were pending at the time the insolvency proceedings were commenced fell… [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
The Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Kitchin, Briggs and Christopher Clarke), at [2015] EWCA Civ 607 , then allowed ConvaTec's appeal and dismissed Smith & Nephew's cross-appeal. [read post]