Search for: "Class Action Defense"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 12,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2021, 5:55 am
The closely-watched case raises a host of important issues concerning the substantive and procedural requirements for certifying a securities fraud class action. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:10 am
Rule 23(a) sets out four requirements that must be met in order for a person or party to establish a class action: “(1) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable; (2) there are questions of law or fact common to the class; (3) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class; and (4) the representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the… [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
” Class action plaintiffs’ attorney Thomas Sobol recommended that CAFA be amended to make it easier for single-state class actions to remain in state court. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 6:03 am
The Panel also agreed with the defense request to transfer the class actions to the Northern District of Ohio, id., at 3.Download PDF file of In re Gadolinium Contrast Dyes Transfer Order [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
Few of them likely realized that they were creating a massive new target for the plaintiffs’ class action bar. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 4:05 am
Defense attorneys moved the circuit court to dismiss the class action complaint, or to stay the class action and compel plaintiff to arbitrate his individual claim based on an arbitration clause that contained a class action waiver. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 5:13 am
The trial court certified a state-wide class action, but deferred ruling on plaintiffs’ request for nationwide class action treatment until additional discovery had been completed. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 2:34 pm
A recent class action lawsuit filed against the state of Florida by ex-felons claims the state’s law regarding the reinstitution of voting rights for those convicted of felonies is arbitrary, and therefore unconstitutional. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 7:59 am
Although the New York attorney general had already extracted $3 million in penalties on the charges, a jury returned a defense verdict in a class-action suit charging that Macy's and other department stores conspired to fix the price of high-end tableware. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 3:44 am
Defense attorneys again demurred to the class action complaint, arguing that the named plaintiffs lacked standing to prosecute the action, id., at 3. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 10:19 am
Other defenses will depend on the precise statutes implicated and facts alleged. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 11:51 am
Defense attorneys removed the class action to federal court on the ground that it raised claims under federal law; plaintiff amended the class action complaint to omit any reference to federal law, and the district court remanded the class action back to state court. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 8:03 pm
Defense attorneys moved to dismiss the class action complaint for lack of standing, _id._, at 1. [read post]
5 May 2019, 9:01 pm
How Do Class Action Settlements Work? [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 10:02 pm
The Seventh Circuit surge One court of appeals has steadfastly defended class actions against those who would curtail use of the class action mechanism. [read post]
11 May 2009, 4:46 am
Plaintiffs’ moved the district court to certify the litigation as a nationwide class action; defense attorneys argued against class action treatment. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:50 am
As class action defense counsel, don't we already know what we'd like? [read post]
6 Sep 2006, 6:14 am
Pioneer’s defense removed the class action to federal court without DEQ’s consent, and the district court denied plaintiffs’ motion to remand it back to state court. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 4:11 am
Defense attorneys moved to dismiss the class action, which the district court granted. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 1:10 am
According to Professor Bartholomew’s vulnerability-based critique, traditional class action scholarship and recent class action caselaw has focused too much on pro-corporation rhetoric, resulting in a superficially neutral, but de facto pro-defense interpretation of the Rule. [read post]
