Search for: "Consumer Law Associates, LLC" Results 1581 - 1600 of 2,187
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2011, 5:39 am by Aaron Tang
Hiro Aragaki – The lynchpin of Justice Scalia’s opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:17 am
One correspondent from the United States, writing from a small law firm, commented: "What a spectacularly common sense idea. ... [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:26 am by Jeffrey May
In that case, which involved a dispute over a consumer contract with an arbitration clause that included a class action waiver, AT&T successfully argued that Federal Arbitration Act preempted a California rule of law that barred the waiver as unconscionable. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 4:57 am by SHG
© 2011 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:44 am by Kevin Russell
Given that AT&T Mobility arose in the consumer law context, the decision was particularly controversial because the arbitration agreement was within an adhesive contract that gave the consumer little or no bargaining power. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:46 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Language Services Associates, LLC, 2011 WL 5024281 (N.D. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 7:02 am by Mandelman
” Tara Twomey – Of Counsel to the National Consumer Law Center and the Amicus Project Director for the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:13 pm by Bruce Nye
Valencia Holding Company, LLC (2011) ___Cal.App.4th___ (2nd Dist., B228027) a consumer case. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Superior Court -- on false and misleading advertising class action litigation brought under the Unfair Competition Law, False Advertising Law, and Consumers Legal Remedies Act. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 7:18 pm by admin
Consumer bankruptcies are nearly double from where they were just five years ago, and are continuing to rise. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:13 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
ALM Media LLC, the Second Circuit answered this question and held that a shorter state law limitations period applied rather than the 4-year federal catchall provision. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:48 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
It employs a unique variation on the principle that arbitration agreements are separable from the contracts of which they are a part, aggressively interprets Court precedents transferring from courts to arbitrators authority to resolve enforceability issues, and segregates the determination a contract has been “made” in a formalistic sense from consideration of defenses to its enforceability and validity.In AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 10:03 am by Carolyn Elefant
Malpractice insurers pay thousands of dollars to support bar associations and my guess is that they see very little value from that investment. [read post]