Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 48,939
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2012, 3:35 pm
On January 18, 2012, the First District Court of Appeals in Hamilton County issued a decision in DeWine v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 6:07 am
Land O’ Lakes, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 10:00 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 11:30 am
The name of the case is UMG v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 5:41 am
Homer v Homer, 2022 WL 4290465 (S.D. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 8:42 am
I do not have much to say about Nunes v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 8:53 am
<> Case Update: Michigan v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:15 pm
In Los Angeles v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 2:17 am
There have been various attempts to allow for costs outside this £50,000, most notably in Henderson v All Around the World [2013] EWPCC 19 (27 March 2013) re the ATE insurance premium (at that time recoverable from the other side) and OOO Abbott v Design & Display Limited [2014] EWHC 3234 (IPEC) (10 October 2014) re costs on the indemnity basis from the period after the Relevant Period for the Part 36 offer has expired at [21]. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 6:03 pm
BancorpSouth v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 1:08 pm
Appeal allowed on the costs point and case remitted to the Magistrates for costs consideration. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:53 am
Tex. 2012) (denying fees and costs incurred in obtaining a court order providing for increased visitation hours), Aldinger v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 9:37 am
On February 26, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Marx v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 9:37 am
On February 26, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Marx v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:09 pm
While this case, Anderson v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 12:06 pm
See United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 1:33 am
The approach taken by the Court was to consider and answer three key questions (most recently applied in Specsavers v Asda Stores Ltd (No 2) [2012] EWCA Civ 494): Which party won the case? [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 2:32 pm
The forced sale of their renowned 165-piece art collection was […] The post Macklowe v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 1:38 am
The First District Court of Appeal sounded a loud warning Tuesday to all appellate counsel: Waste our time, and it will cost you. [read post]
