Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 16,690
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2022, 1:35 pm
Gelbach states his claim in the context of discussing a single randomized controlled trial (ASCOT-LLA), but his broad pronouncements are carelessly framed such that others may take them to apply to a single observational study, with its greater threats to internal validity. [read post]
Federal Court of Appeal’s Decision in Mohr Provides Guidance Under Section 48 of the Competition Act
25 Aug 2022, 12:37 pm
Our experience includes advising clients in Toronto, Canada and the United States on the application of Canadian competition and regulatory laws and we have worked on hundreds of domestic and cross-border competition, advertising and marketing, promotional contest (sweepstakes), conspiracy (cartel), abuse of dominance, compliance, refusal to deal and pricing and distribution matters. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 8:18 am
Facts: This case (Burrows et al v. 3M Company – United States District Court – Western District of Washington – August 12, 2022) involves a personal injury claim. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 7:44 am
State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 12:03 pm
Because the Baker v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 8:08 am
Garrow, Pulitzer Prize–winning author of Bearing the Cross and Liberty and Sexuality--Dan Ernst [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
For example, should Homeland Security focus on recent entrants who crossed the border without visas? [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
None of the testimony of witnesses heard at the committee hearing ran the gauntlet of defense cross-examination. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
” Tiburon Open Space Committee v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 11:09 am
” Next, Ellis’s counsel, Michael Melito, jumps into frame to cross-examine Wooten. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 3:45 am
Where, as here, the defendants submitted evidentiary material in support of that branch of their cross motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the complaint, the criterion becomes whether the plaintiff has a cause of action, not whether one is stated (see Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275; Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 845). [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 7:40 am
" Harris v. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 6:00 am
Accordingly, Circuit Court concluded that the audit was within the scope of the Fund trustees’ authority under the Supreme Court’s decision inCentral States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 6:00 am
Accordingly, Circuit Court concluded that the audit was within the scope of the Fund trustees’ authority under the Supreme Court’s decision inCentral States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 3:23 pm
But Kansas law has rejected this principle as a matter of state law, see Gobin v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
While not directly comparable, this is similar to the position affirmed by the Court in Gillette v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 8:29 pm
Before the Court were the parties cross-motions for summary judgment. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 5:10 pm
"] From the Virginia Supreme Court's decision in Loudoun County School Bd. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 7:53 am
State v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 1:27 am
As I reported on Tuesday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hear the Epic Games v. [read post]
